CROP GROWTH ANALYSIS IN COOL SEASON CEREAL CROPS: Insights From Pot Experiments On NPK Sources, Soil Types, And NP Levels

★★★★★ 4.7 148 reviews

US$90.00
Price when purchased online
Free shipping Free 30-day returns

Sold and shipped by myndbody.com
We aim to show you accurate product information. Manufacturers, suppliers and others provide what you see here.
US$90.00
Price when purchased online
Free shipping Free 30-day returns

How do you want your item?
You get 30 days free! Choose a plan at checkout.
Shipping
Arrives Jul 28
Free
Pickup
Check nearby
Delivery
Not available

Sold and shipped by myndbody.com
Free 30-day returns Details

Product details

Management number 233411336 Release Date 2026/06/27 List Price US$90.00 Model Number 233411336
Category

This book synthesizes findings from three controlled pot experiments designed to advance understanding of crop growth analysis in cool-season cereal crops. By systematically evaluating the effects of NPK fertilizer sources, soil types, and nitrogen–phosphorus (NP) levels, the study provides clear physiological evidence on how nutrient balance and substrate quality regulate cereal growth, biomass accumulation, and resource partitioning.Across all experiments, growth measurements taken at 30, 60, and 90 days after emergence revealed that cereal performance is strongly governed by balanced nutrient supply, soil physical–chemical properties, and species-specific growth strategies. Among the winter cereals, barley consistently exhibited superior growth efficiency and biomass production, while wheat showed strong root development and early vigor, oats demonstrated pronounced late-stage canopy expansion, and **rye maintained intermediate but stable growth traits.Results from the NPK source experiment clearly demonstrated that balanced fertilizer formulations enhanced plant height, leaf area development, dry matter accumulation, and growth rates, whereas unbalanced or excessively nitrogen-rich sources severely restricted root growth, disrupted shoot–root balance, and reduced overall performance. These findings highlight the risks of improper fertilizer selection and the importance of nutrient harmony rather than high nitrogen input alone.The soil type experiment confirmed that soil quality is a critical driver of nutrient use efficiency and biomass partitioning. Nutrient-rich, well-structured substrates promoted greater root development, leaf area, and total dry matter, while low-quality soils consistently limited growth regardless of crop species. Differences between wheat and rye further emphasized adaptive strategies, with wheat favoring biomass accumulation and rye optimizing canopy efficiency and root exploration.The NP levels experiment in oats provided strong evidence that nitrogen without adequate phosphorus is detrimental, leading to nutrient toxicity, restricted root growth, and inefficient biomass allocation. In contrast, combined moderate N + P application maximized growth, water use efficiency, and total biomass, confirming the central role of nutrient balance in sustaining crop productivity.Collectively, the findings underscore that optimizing fertilizer source, nutrient balance, and soil substrate—while accounting for crop-specific physiological traits—is essential for improving growth efficiency and sustainable cereal production. This book provides a scientific foundation for better fertilizer management, improved resource-use efficiency, and environmentally responsible agronomic practices in cool-season cereal systems. Read more

ASIN B0GLRCSQ8V
XRay Not Enabled
Language English
File size 4.3 MB
Page Flip Enabled
Word Wise Not Enabled
Reading age 10 - 18 years
Print length 260 pages
Accessibility Learn more
Screen Reader Supported
Publication date February 5, 2026
Enhanced typesetting Enabled

Correction of product information

If you notice any omissions or errors in the product information on this page, please use the correction request form below.

Correction Request Form

Customer ratings & reviews

4.7 out of 5
★★★★★
148 ratings | 61 reviews
How item rating is calculated
View all reviews
5 stars
86% (127)
4 stars
2% (3)
3 stars
1% (1)
2 stars
1% (1)
1 star
10% (15)
Sort by

There are currently no written reviews for this product.